CMMC Level 2 (Advanced)
Repeatable • Provable • Maintainable
CMMC Level 2: treat it like a system, not a checklist.
Level 2 becomes manageable when you build a repeatable process: requirements → implementation → evidence → remediation → ongoing maintenance. Most “surprises” come from scope drift and evidence that isn’t traceable.
Informational only. Not legal advice. Requirements vary by contract language, flowdowns, data types, and program updates.
Follow official guidance and your contract requirements.
What changes from Level 1
The common “gotchas”
Depth + discipline
Controls may already exist, but Level 2 expects stronger traceability and consistency over time.
- Policies must match tools, roles, and workflows you actually use.
- Evidence must be current, attributable, and maintained (not one-time).
- Scope boundaries must be defensible (systems, vendors, cloud apps).
High-pressure areas
These are frequent assessment pain points.
- Incident response maturity (roles, timelines, exercising/testing proof)
- Audit logging depth (retention, protection, review cadence)
- Configuration management (baselines + change control you can prove)
- Supplier considerations (where vendors touch CUI)
Practical rule: if you can’t produce the evidence quickly (with date/system/owner context), it will feel like a gap even when the control “sort of” exists.
A clean sequence that prevents rework
The path that keeps scope + evidence aligned
1) Lock scope
Identify where CUI lives and reduce sprawl where possible.
- Contracts + flowdowns first
- Users/endpoints/cloud apps/vendors
- Boundary you can explain and defend
2) Build an evidence map
Every requirement should map to evidence items and owners.
- Evidence library folder structure
- Requirement → evidence → owner → last updated
- Review cadence (monthly/quarterly)
3) Align documentation
Policies/procedures must describe real workflows and tools.
- No template mismatch
- Roles and approvals are clear
- Records show you follow the SOP
4) Remediate by risk
Close gaps in priority order, then validate consistency.
- Quick wins first (identity, endpoints, logging)
- Then governance/process maturity
- Then repeatable maintenance
Want this turned into an execution plan? Federal Bid Partners provides readiness support under client direction (not legal advice, not a government determination).
CMMC Support →